In the debate about what a second Donald Trump term would mean for the stability of American democracy, parsing the “true” meaning of any given Trumpian rhetorical flourish — Was he just predicting a “bloodbath” for the auto industry if Joe Biden wins, or prophesying civil war? — is about 60 times less useful than figuring out who will actually staff a second Trump administration.
Will it be a reprise of Trump’s first few years in office, when a collection of Wall Streeters, generals and stock figures from the pre-Trump GOP filled his Cabinet, creating a parallel reality of normal-ish Republican governance alongside White House chaos and presidential rants? Or will it be a reprise of the first term’s last two months, when the normal people slipped away and Trump was left alone to play the authoritarian with a set of enablers and kooks?
After Jan. 6, 2021, it seemed hard to imagine the first reprise happening. Surely nobody normal or establishmentarian would want to work for Trump again, and surely Trump himself would want a team of ruthless populist avengers. So to envision a second Trump term was to envision an administration staffed by acting secretaries too strange for Senate confirmation.
But that isn’t what Trump is signaling right now. His desperation for donor money as he deals with mounting legal bills has him kissing up to Wall Street financiers. And in a similar spirit, his campaign just leaked its desire to put classic hawkish internationalists, not Tucker Carlson guests, in charge of the national security bureaucracy.
© 2024 The New York Times Company